If you've been following this Pulitzer-nod series, you'll be aware that elevation to this lofty musical élite is contingent upon the album having no demerits, faults, or lapses from artistic or professional perfection in any area. Yes, yes, *eyeroll emoji* yeah well it's all subjective innit one person's opinion is as good as another's innit *yawn emoji*. Bearing all this in mind the inclusion of Culture's benchmark album might seem to be a surprise, because the cover, at first glance, doesn't reach the Warner Brothers Art Department standards. And the cover has to be as great as the music to get a Perfect Ten (so no Pet Sounds, f'rinstance - harsh? Maybe, but I don't make the rules).
The cover, for all we know designed by a Dave at the Kingston printer's, makes a unique and immediate impact. I can only think of the inferior sleeve to Ry Cooder's Paradise And Lunch (ironically a product of the Warner Brothers Art Department) that looks remotely similar. The colours are straight from the process ink tins, the photograph is snapshot quality (that horizon! the cropping! the finger in the ear!), the sevens seem clipped from an ironmongery catalogue, the dash before the band name is bonkers ... it should be a graphic graveyard, but it works. The layout is inspired (even the Joe Gibbs logo and credit adds to the composition), with a dynamic use of space, light and shade, and proportion. No shit. Some eye is at work here. The sun-saturated vibe of Jamaica warms you up just looking at it. And - it's mysterious. Two sevens clashing? What the actual?
![]() |
Joseph Hill, yesterday |
This may have been the first true roots reggae album I heard. Bob Marley? Well, okay. euuhhh. But Culture packed an atmospheric punch that hit me in the heart, like stepping into tropical heat from an air-conditioned plane. This was the beat of lazy submarine depths, the shimmer of water under a limitless blue sky. The whole album was a trip outside a grey suburban life, authentic, unique, beautiful, its shining power undiminished over the years. For Culture, it was a peak they never quite reached again, but very few did.
Hi to Koen, who passed through my home town yesterday!
The Freeload™ will include a bunch of Culture.
ReplyDelete"Culture" is a great name for a band. Your favourite? (And anyone voting for "Beatles" will get pantsed - https://slate.com/human-interest/2012/07/gretchen-hamel-pantsing-where-did-pantsing-and-depantsing-come-from.html )
I always thought XTC was neat. (but i'm pretty simple, so...)
ReplyDeleteCats On a Smooth Surface --Muzak McM
ReplyDeletePunk has always been an overachiever here, and the Dead Kennedys and the Dayglo Abortions come to mind. JFKFC, with their logo that combined the colonel with the 35th president, was another that always made me smile while perusing the stacks back in the day.
ReplyDeleteC in California
Oh, and I've an extensive collection of pre-reggae, and a smaller dose of the post-mid-70s stuff, so I expected the hype about Two Sevens to pan out, but it didn't move me. I'll give it another ear when you offer it, to see if anything's changed.
DeleteC in California
I'd like you to explain a couple of things:
Delete- What does "pre-reggae" mean, apart from "before reggae", which would mean nearly everything in the history of the universe? Ska? That's not the same thing at all, is it?
- I'd always thought "hype" meant hyperbole, wild exaggeration in the sense of whipping up unwarranted interest (and sales). Two Sevens Clash got, as far as I can tell, universally good reviews, based on the album's evident quality, but they don't count as hype, do they? Forgive me, but are you playing the music snob card here? It's something I've done a lot. Been into something, and when it got popular with a breakthrough album for a mass audience, turned my back on it.
By pre-reggae, I mean the bluebeat and rocksteady and, yes, ska that formed the threads of reggae. Before an orthodoxy set in. I like the same period, as an analogy, when punk was on the ground floor and it meant more of a 'anyone can do this' attitude than 'play it fast and aggro or it's not punk'. Sure, not everyone could, but I liked the creativity, the 'throw it against the wall and see what sticks'-ism. And a competent punk band can be a thing of beauty, so no reverse snobbism intended there.
DeleteAs to Culture, snobbism didn't even occur to me; I was merely pointing out that I'd heard such good things about the album -- and was a fan of great stuff, in my opinion -- that I expected to be wowed. I wasn't, but that's why I declared I was curious to hear it again to see if my opinion changed. That strikes me as purty un-snobbish! I've never turned my back on something that took off (much of the stuff I've favored never had a shot at it, anyway), and, indeed, would be delighted if it did if it meant my beloved artist was successful enough to keep on putting out the music that I liked/loved. The backlash in the 90s and beyond to songs being in commercials/shows was beyond me, because bands I liked/loved got exposure and paychecks that sustained them (e.g., Low, the Caesars, the Minutemen, Nick Drake [too late for the paycheck, but not the exposure]). It didn't hurt that I didn't/don't watch TV, so couldn't be bothered by 'my song' being hijacked to sell widgets. But really, would hearing a loved song on a commercial REALLY ruin it for somebody? Folks said videos had the same effect -- replacing your mind's eye with someone else's vision. Never happened to me.
C in California
I was deliberately being too literal with "hype", understanding it only in the sense of marketing-led flim-flammery, but I really wanted to hear more. The way we connect with (or not) a piece of art - what we're talking about - is sometimes beyond rational explanation, there's no cause and effect involved, no reasoned train of thought. Prejudice can play a large part - I was prejudiced against the New York Dolls because, as I thought, they couldn't play for shit and were a bunch of posers. My loss. As soon as I heard it, it clicked. Then again, I had to play Once Upon A Dream - an album I was prejudiced to like - many times over the years before it resonated (to use pmac's precise term).
DeleteI was aware of ska and bluebeat and rocksteady before I heard roots, but they didn't do much for me, one of the reasons being they are essentially singles genres, and best heard in dancehalls (which I never went to). I couldn't imagine listening to an album of ska. For some reason roots and dub ticked boxes I didn't know I had. I couldn't rationalise it. It was maybe the first time I connected with music that hadn't been made with me - or somebody like me - in mind. I discovered it on my own (through the wonderful John Peel), and had an immediate and personal relationship with it. I never got into the deep, obscure stuff, just the "greatest hits" acts (apart from Bob, who never completely convinced somehow). Burning Spear, The Congos, The Gladiators etc. But Two Sevens Clash and Heart Of The Congos have an indefinable magic about them, something at once intensely physical and waayyyyyy out there, and I'd grab both of them before diving off a flaming dirigible.
pre-reggae as in pre-ejaculation ...what's that darkening cloud overhead...could that be white privilege ? it wasn't suppose to happen here or was it ???
ReplyDeleteDe Sufgerukte Wallies. De Bronstgieters, Ein Warmer Sommermorgen, The Very Things, I Ludicrous. Bow Wow Wow. We've got a fuzzbox and we're gonna use it
ReplyDeleteThese seven jump right up when thinking about great band-names.
I used to think reggae was something you played when you didn't want to hear music.
Nowadays I think there is a bit more to it. The ranges of reggae and everything I throw in that basket has widened up for me. I have listened to Regga, Raggae, Reggea and even Reggay.
The only kind I didn't like was Reggie.
And then I heard a Jools Holland tune, piano, bass drums and that wonderful Jimmy Cliff singing Many Rivers To Cross in a repeat from 2007.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISMSAkVTTRM
Buncha Culcha right here:
ReplyDeletehttps://workupload.com/file/hp73WENMEcx
(Eight albums, waddya waddya)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThat is indeed a cracker of a band name.
DeleteGreat British band names - sorry those of you outside.
ReplyDeleteHatfield and The North - already established fact see below:
https://falsememoryfoam.blogspot.com/search?q=John+Wayne+socks
The Teardrop Explodes
Crispy Ambulance (a Peel favourite)
Half Man Half Biscuit (a Peel favourite), also their tribute band It Ain’t Half Man Mum.
Bastard Custard (a local band that never did anything, but should have been huge with that name :-)
Sometimes bands whose names are so familiar now lose their connection with the original reasoning behind the name.
ReplyDeleteFairport Convention - cleverly named because the band used to convene at a house called Fairport for rehearsals.
The Nozzles, ca. 1975. We didn't sing or play any "instruments," but we had the right attitude.
ReplyDeleteDon't really know their music but liked the names:
ReplyDeleteDon Henley Must Die
Butthole Surfers
Meat Puppets