Thursday, June 22, 2023

TL-DR Dept. - "Why Dead Heads Are Full Of Shit"

Dead Heads™, yestiddy


Today, Dead Heads™ fall into three basic species, as shown above [above - Ed.]. From left, the Old Hippie, Mr. Hip Businessman, and Tucker Carlson. The Old Hippie lives in a Malibu beach house which boasts a climate-controlled Dead Vault containing digitised copies of every known live recording. Mr. Hip Businessman lives in an Alpine chalet designed by Le Corbusier and keeps his extensive collection of Dead memorabilia in a Swiss bank. Tucker Carlson? Yup. He's a Dead Head™, can list his top five live versions of Althea. The Dead's broad church includes an army of shitferbrains gun-humping nutbars. Good people on both sides, right? Uh ...

They all share a belief in the core Dead Head scriptures, and the First Commandment is, Thou Hast To Have Been There. That many of them weren't, or were barely on the periphery, doesn't matter. The second, and the one that concerns us today, is Yea, The Studio Albums Kinda Suck
They're for us Walmart shoppers out here. Why? Because they don't capture their live magic, and hey! - the band hated being in the studio! And yadda yadda. It's achieved critical opinion mass - the studio albums (except for the two obvious exceptions that even twenty-somethings might have heard of) are regularly dismissed by *cough* "rock critics" and there's always some internet pencil-neck regurgitating the same old crap, etching it deeper into the public psyche as a "rock fact". They can't mention a studio album with shoe-horning in the old trope [you said trope huhuhrr - Ed.] about it not being as good as the live experience. These people are full of shit, and I'm here to tell you why.

Of course the Dead were a live band first - they lived for the stage, not the studio. That doesn't mean the albums are garbage, or even sub par. They didn't approach recording cynically or lazily, they gave it their considerable best. The studio was where they had to stop fucking about, and for a band whose holy mission was to fuck about, it was a stretch. But it was where they created their core repertoire, flexed their experimental muscle, and did their best singing - although they're never going to be thought of as a vocals band, they could sing a whole lot better than the impression given by their live performances. Nope, endless takes and retakes in a windowless room with just mics and chairs and headachy lighting was as close to back-breaking labor as these guys got, but when they finished their assignment they got to go outside and play, like good boys. And the albums reached a global audience that spread even further than their tour itineraries. The majority of Grateful Dead fans - us Walmart shoppers - never saw them in concert, and became fans through the studio recordings. To dismiss them en masse [Fr. - en bloc - Ed.] because it's not the live experience is just dumb. And lazy. And dumb. But mostly dumb.

Swell album. Bite me.
The studio albums are disconcertingly varied, reflecting the wide individual skills and tastes of the band. From the avant garde (avant everyone) cut-ups of Aoxomoxoa through the radio-friendly Go To Heaven, they're all way better than the Dead Heads™want you to know, because they believe they own the idea of the Grateful Dead. They're theirs, unnerstan'? And the fact that the Dead mostly are dead these days and therefore unavailable for concert performance doesn't seem to register. The Dead's live recordings can be fantastic, but let's face it, Dead Heads™, you're just squaring those Dave's Picks up on your custom-built Deadshelf, occasionally sampling a disc through iPods with a bag of Werthers on the couch and trying to get the rug in focus. That ain't exactly the live experience, pally - it's a near death experience. Nobody sane has the time or willpower to sit through even one multi-disc box set, leave alone dozens. The container ship volume of live recordings is too daunting for just plain folks to approach, and every year we get another essential set from the golden year of whenever to file alongside all the others. Enough awready! This is not healthy!

Not seen in studio
No one studio album defines Grateful Deadness in the public mind, acts as their Dark Side Of The Moon, or Kind Of Blue. American Beauty probably gets close, but it's a unique snapshot of them at that time, like all the others, and as soon as you say American Beauty somebody leaps down your throat with Workingman's Dead. There's no consensus as to their "best" album. There's always a shift, sometimes sideways, sometimes back, from one album to the next. A blurred zig and zag rather than a consumer-friendly straight line. So the overall narrative of the studio albums is hard to follow, because it ain't there - the chronology is irrelevant. Look at it this way - none of their albums is transitional, you can start anywhere. They never made a classic iconic rock album in the sense that, say, Led Zeppelin or The Eagles did because they were never really a "rock band" at all, in spite of appearances. A good friend of mine (hi, Stuart!) could never get over his disappointment with the music after the hard rock promise of those great psychedelic covers. He's not alone in expecting something the Dead never delivered, and unless you can take them (and the albums) on their own terms rather than yours, you'll be scratching your noggin at all those bozos on the bus letting the air out of their shoes. That's groovy, too. It's your trip, man.

Given that there is no majority-voted and definitively representative studio album, any interested music fan (as opposed to Dead Head™) has to discover their own gateway disc that will suddenly click for them. From The Mars Hotel has always been Top Five Dead for me. From the gorgeous two-for-the-price-of-one cover [above - Ed.] to the filler-free thirty-eight minutes or so of swell tunes, it delivers on every level. What other band could have made this album? None. None other band. It not only sounds like none other band, it doesn't sound much like any other Grateful Dead album. Like all the others don't. Let's take a detailed look at each track to see how the whole thing comes together! [let's not - Ed.]

Note how Ugly Rumors appear mirrored and upside down in the great tradition of oh wow man, and is a play on the "ugly roomers" at the Mars Hotel depicted on the back cover. It's this kind of attention to detail that [remaining text lost in freak internet storm - Ed.]

ADDEADUM

A small discussion in the comments about the cover to Go To Heaven cover prompted me to get my crayons out and come up with an alternative:














This post homologated by AAAAAAAAAA(AAAAAA) - Affiliated American Amalgamated Accurate Album Awareness, Assessment And Appreciation Association (Anaheim And Azusa, And Also Albuquerque) 


75 comments:

  1. Here's Mars, with the added bonus of no extra tracks or live versions. Just the album, as it was heard on the day, poifec'!

    https://workupload.com/file/kkw2Uuamaru

    ReplyDelete
  2. Amen brother, testify &etc. The Dead are probably the one band above all others whose albums look better than they sound. This may seem flippant, but to me they always sound like they haven't "quite" learned the songs and are playing them ever-so-tentatively for the first time. There's no fire, blood and guts there like you got with, say, Cream live. It's all a bit hesitant and under rehearsed (yeah, I know it's largely improv). It's not like I haven't tried, but even the critics' choice Workingman's Dead leaves me cold. And don't get me started on Dylan & the Dead, probably Bob's most dismal album by a considerable margin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think Dylan And The Dead is probably everybody's most dismal album. But I think the Dead's studio output is (mostly) just swell. To criticise the albums for lacking fire, blood and guts is like telling off an orange for not being a cat.

      (Say, fellows! Don't miss Stuart's great blog
      https://andnowitsallthis.blogspot.com - it's nearly as good as FalseMemoryFoam© - high praise indeed!)

      Delete
    2. The diffident vocals that sound like nobody wants to sing, the one-key noodling, the struggling to find a tune, the poundshop Americana ... I listened under the influence of LSD (another deadhead cliche about how you will "get" them) was no better, and i wanted to like them, as I wanted to be a hippie with a huge corpus of music to explore. If I want psychedelia, Gong and Hawkwind do the job far better.

      Delete
    3. Well put Stuart,I've had thousands of albums and untold thousand mp3,Grateful Dead? Could not get past a few minutes of any song live or studio track.I respect those that do and there are many,so lets celebrate them.

      Delete
    4. Mr Grimsdale looks up from his dry toast and Marmite to mutter "If I want psychedelia ..." Well, Grimbo, if I want psychedelia I don't listen to the Dead, I listen to the type of stuff I mashed into the Thirty Minutes tri-ology. And I certainly don't listen to Hawkwind (Mandies/Quaaludes band) or *shudder* prancing teapot pixies Gong. Y'see, Grimbo, you're expecting something from the dead that they don't deliver, like Stuart (who also Likes Donovan, so we must make allowances). They're no more psychedelic than they are hard rock or jazz or country. You only listen to them because you want to listen to the Dead.

      Delete
    5. I think you need to work more on your view of Gong, Farq. And "Space Ritual" with "Julie's best" is the best fun you can have when not rutting (and not bad when you are).

      Delete
    6. You may be right, but I'm unwilling to let go of a prejudice I've nurtured to fruition over decades.

      Delete
  3. For me the "gateway disc" was Terrapin Station. And the title track was one where the studio definitely won. They never played the full version of it while they were still the Grateful Dead.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Having suffered through Robert Hunter's full version I fully understand why the Dead never recorded or performed Part 2. Hunter's quoted reason for distancing himself from the band was his disagreement with the production, but I wonder if it was really because the band didn't give the whole album over to his magnum opus. Anyway, I enjoyed the album for many years until I realised I wasn't any more.

      Delete
  4. You might like to sample John Hilgart's work on GD live material at https://saveyourface.posthaven.com. If you haven't already. I am trying very hard not to use the word curated so I'll stop now before I do.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sorry, Mr. Confused, but you used the "C" word, so you must suffer the appropriate punishment, which is to be keelhauled under a Yogi Bear inflatable in th' IoF© pool. Harsh? Perhaps.

      Delete
    2. Harsh but fair. I would expect nothing less,

      Delete
  5. Right, this is their very last chance, I've tried Workingman's Dead, and American Beauty, and even bought Wake of The Flood (played twice, maybe). So From The Mars Hotel, might just be the gateway to my enlightenment. I don't really have the shelf space to become a Dead Head though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're right, it didn't.
      But on a more positive note, I really like the Gubmint Mule new album, thanks.

      Delete
    2. They got everything right with that one!

      Delete
  6. Replies
    1. And I think that's the thing - if you have to try to enjoy the Dead, it's not going to happen. Pretty much like most things, really - you either like something or not, no big deal.

      Delete
    2. ^^^This^^^

      Myself, I tried and tried, and then I tried some more to get into Karlheinz Stockhausen, because “on paper” it seemed like a musical fit for me. Sometimes, I wonder if I tried too hard?

      Delete
    3. Karlheinz Stockhausen is such an imposing name that i'm afraid not to like him. i wonder if his mom used to call him "Heinzy"?

      Delete
    4. I once suffered from Stockhausen Syndrome, which is a variant of the psychological phenomenon known as Stockholm Syndrome, you know, where a kidnapped victim develops sympathy for their kidnappers. Those suffering from the Stockhausen condition believe they’ve obtained a deep appreciation for a tedious and/or poorly executed avant-garde performance. This syndrome helps suppress the infuriating realization that someone, not unlike myself, is wasting their time, money and mental energy.

      This is ‘Kontakte’ considered by many to be “Heinzy’s” finest work. See what you think.
      https://workupload.com/file/84q9J6Yq4SH

      Delete
    5. Stockhausen is one of the several people who went unnoticed/unrecognised on the Thirty Minutes *curations*. So if you've been listening to those you've been listening to him with no problem!

      Delete
    6. "Stockhausen Syndrome" is very good. The sample I used is from my favorite - I'm sure we all have one - Stocky album "Hymnen" (nb not "hymen" - refine your search terms). It's a monster prog-rock double, and only the first three sides are unlistenable. The fourth ("Fourth Region") has structure and dynamics and is surprisingly fantastic. I used to have a rare double "Stockhausen's Greatest Hits" (no, really) on Polydor, with a die-cut sleeve. That was groovy.

      Delete
    7. Perhaps predictably, Karlheinz is already on th' IoF© (everything is):

      https://falsememoryfoam.blogspot.com/2019/09/saturday-slug-fest.html

      Delete
    8. Stockhausen Syndrome by Proxy is what happens when you force your kids to listen to his LPs. Incidentally, in 1971 I worked for a West End music publisher who were the UK agent for Stockhausen. His music scores didn't use conventional notation but a series of symbols and squiggles which appeared through holes on a revolving cardboard disc (think LZIII). Even 50+ years ago these scores sold for £30- £50. I hate to think what they would be worth today.

      Delete
    9. Still chuckling over the Tucker Carlson reference

      Delete
    10. It's always encouraging to get a comment from a 4/5g© what has actually READ THE FUCKING POST. You know, unlike SOME PEOPLE.

      (And it's a warm hand on Mr. Pune's entrance, please.)

      Delete
  7. My introduction to The Dead was ‘Anthem of the Sun’ during the summer of ’68. Anthem went well with weed and Dexamyl; my drugs of choice back then.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mine was Live Dead, one of the first albums-to-get-stoned-to I got stoned to. And I really don't actually need another version of Dark Star. This one still works fine.

      Delete
    2. This hits a counter argument to the idea that they never had their "Kind Of Blue" moment in their studio albums: it arbitrarily excludes those early live albums - the ones that were real releases as regular albums, as opposed to the much later tidal surge of vault recordings.

      Any of Live/Dead, Grateful Dead or Europe '72 would make a better gateway than any of the five studio albums they had released up to that point. They should be up for consideration as the band's Kind Of Blue / Dark Side Of The Moon moments.

      Never mind the live vs studio aspect. The kicker is that these early live albums had new material. They were the first releases of the Dead playing Dark Star, Bertha, Wharf Rat, Jack Straw, Turn On Your Lovelight, Playing In The Band, Me And My Uncle, One More Saturday Night, etc, etc.

      St. Stephen had been released on Aoxomoxoa, but otherwise Live/Dead was a double album of all new material. The Other One had appeared on Anthem Of The Sun in shorter form, but otherwise Grateful Dead was completely new as well. Even Europe '72 was about half new material.

      Delete
    3. Yup, what you said, but you will note this post is about their studio albums. I'd add the unjustly neglected Steal Your Face to your list. Never agreed with the h8trz on that one. Here's a damn fine read, should youse be desirous:

      https://falsememoryfoam.blogspot.com/2020/03/tl-dr-dept-pariah-redux.html

      Delete
  8. The Dead? Endless fucking noodling for the entertainment of the psychedelically impaired.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Ever since I saw them perform "Mountains of the Moon" on Playboy After Dark Aoxomoxoa's been the one for me. And, I prefer the original mix -- found here (in flac & mp3): https://www.imagenetz.de/hiPGs

    ReplyDelete
  10. If you can't appreciate "American Beauty" in the slightest, there might be something wrong with you.

    That is all, carry on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As true as it is, it's not all. I will leap down your throat with Workingman's, a cool beer to American Beauty's red wine.

      Delete
    2. Workingman's is my favorite, with an honorable mention to Blues for Allah.

      Delete
    3. In the course of my in-depth research for this piece I listened to Go To Heaven, and again I'm asking myself, what's wrong with this album? The answer, as ever, is none.

      Delete
    4. "Heaven" gets a bad rap, I'm not sure why, as it's solid from start to finish.

      Delete
  11. As a Bay Area guy, you'd think I would have seen them, but never did. I did see Garcia once, at one of the concerts that led me out of the arenas and into the close fightin' quarters of a small club punk rock caged matches.

    I will offer for discussion a random quote I recall about them (can't recall who said it...) For two nights out of three, they're the worst band in America. But for one night out of three, they're the best band in America."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I saw The Dead at least five times a year from when I first got into them in 1968, to the last tour in 1995.

      Speaking to:
      “For two nights out of three, they're the worst band in America. But for one night out of three, they're the best band in America.”
      I think that was true of the Keith & Donna Godchaux era Dead. The Pig Pen and Brent Midland era Dead shows (at least the ones I saw) were much more consistent.

      Yes, there were quite a few “clunkers”, but bear in mind, The Dead performed an estimated 2,318 concerts between 1965 and 1995, and according to The Dead, they only played the same set list twice on 10-12-1968 and 10-13-1968 at the Avalon Ballroom in San Francisco. What other act can make that claim? Also, on any given night, roughly half the show was improvisation.

      Delete
    2. Donna Godchaux. *shudder*. I'm sure she was a great person and something of an artist in her own right, but the Dead needed her like Dickey Betts needed a nice cup of Earl Grey with a biscuit in the saucer.

      Delete
    3. I might star using "biscuit in the saucer" as a euphemism.

      Delete
  12. As for live albums, Skull & Roses and the original Europe 72 (NOT the whole tour box...) are all I need (and more). I agree that the studio LPs are greatly lacking, but I will check out Mars Hotel. Always liked the cover. Thanks for putting it out there as all you usually see in Workingman's Dead & American Beauty,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mars Hotel is idiosyncratic, thoughtful, quiet. Kicks off with catchy boogie-lite US Blues, dives straight into one of the strangest songs ever written. A lament for ... what, exactly? And the chorus eventually shows up right at the end of the song. Once. Unbroken Chain is a Phil Lesh song with an illogical structure (led, appropriately, by sidestepping bass) that gets more interesting as you get more into it. Loose Lucy is a cool little funky shuffle, Scarlet Begonias is a Robert Hunter story song, about backing away from a "she" who was "not like other girls". Every line's a winner, and it has this blindingly great koan of a couplet:
      "Once in a while, you get shown the light
      In the strangest of places if you look at it right"
      Pride Of Cucamonga is almost an earworm from Lesh, to prove he could do it. "Oh! Oh! Oh! Pride of Cucamonga!" (and we should all know everything about Cucamonga by now), "Money, Money" is Weir's only contribution, and his singing is up to the demands of the lyric: "money, money, money, money, money, money, money, money, money, money, money ..." As close as the album gets to filler, but it's redeemed by the epic Ship Of Fools which closes out the album, with its allusive but strangely direct lyric, beautifully sung by Garcia.

      Eight songs that could have come from nowhere else but the Mars Hotel.

      Delete
    2. While I'm here, I can't understand why those who enjoy only American Beauty (and Workingman's) can't embrace From The Mars Hotel. It's song-based, with strong singing, catchy choruses, great lyrics ... what's the problem here?

      Delete
    3. Maybe cuz David Grisman didn't add his experise to it? I always appreciate a bit of mandolin.

      Delete
    4. I'll let you in on a secret only true dead heads know.
      The Grateful Dead decided to 'hide' the working title of the album for the Mars Hotel on the front cover. There is some wacky gibberish on the front cover underneath the band's name. If you hold the album cover up to a mirror and turn it (the album cover, not the mirror) upside down, it reveals the 'real' title. . . UGLY RUMORS. According to bobby Weir, the band used to pass by the Mars Hotel on the way to the studio and used to see some 'ugly roomers' hanging out in front.

      Delete
    5. Uh ... Babs ... read the last paragraph in my piece ... you don't have to read the rest of it ... just the last paragraph ...

      Delete
  13. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Luop forgives you, sorry I deleted my secret message too soon.

      Delete
    2. My keepers say night-night......& More cowbell!

      Delete
  14. As to why "Go To Heaven" was dismissed, I suggest the cover was a big problem. Album covers showed your allegience to your subcultural group. "Going disco" meant "selling out to make money" which wasn't welcomed by those still dreaming of the Summer of Love (although it would only be a few short years until Henley's "Dead-head stick on a Cadillac" would really nail what was really happening. Plus, disco in and of itself was not respected by almost anyone shopping in the "Rock" section of a record store. Here in the "progressive" Bay Area, Rock/pop was on one aisle, and R&B/disco/pop was in a separate aisle...and while it wasn't intended to be racially segregated, it was de facto segregation. "Rock" fans weren't buying Shalimar, the S.O.S. Band, and Yarborough & Peoples (who, I notice...were in similar all-white outfits on the cover of The Two Of Us....)

    ReplyDelete
  15. GD is an act I've barely heard even after all this time (aside from the rather good 'Live Dead') such is the forbidding size of their catalogue, so thanks for offering this alternate entrance. As a Disco fan of some experience I will have to check out 'Go To Heaven', loving as I do attempts to cash in by outsiders such as Chicago, Lou Reed, Paul McCartney.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There's nothing really disco about Go To Heaven!

      Delete
    2. There's not...musically. But on the cover the band was dressed in the uniform of another team, and that's enough for the critics. (And some of the audience; I had a friend who "got into punk" because he bought Petty's first LP. Leather jacket = punk)

      Delete
    3. I dunno, though - was that their intent? Album title Go To Heaven, album cover shows them in angelic duds surrounded by glowing white cloud. Ultimately, it doesn't matter. It's a bad cover because it's "obviously" humorous/ironic yet unamusing on any level, and the joke is ambiguous. But yes, the cover sunk it, which is a damn shame. They had trouble coming up with covers for In The Dark and Built To Last, too.

      Delete
    4. Good question. The Heavenly Host metaphor is obvious, but remember, we were just a few years past Travolta's "white disco suit" and Saturday Night Fever. While I was vaccinated and never caught it, I feared it and made sure to "socially distance" myself from anyone who was obviously infected. I'll also offer a few quotes from the Wiki from two of the band:

      Bassist Phil Lesh said "The cover, featuring us in Saturday Night Fever disco suits against a white background, reinforced the impression that we were 'going commercial'.

      Kreutzmann likewise stated "If you go back and listen to it, you’ll find that time has been very kind to Go to Heaven. It plays better now than it did back then. That’s still no excuse for the cover, though – all six of us, dressed all in white disco suits against a white background."

      So...they think they were in "disco suits," even if going for the look of a bunch of guys on a white cloud in heaven. This has now become a self fulfulling problem: In an effort to find OTHER LP covers, I googled "disco white suit album covers," and the very first image is "Go To Heaven."

      Delete
    5. Right. So disco was the intent. Baffling. I wonder if someone had second thoughts, and with a little airbrushing turned Go Disco to Go To Heaven.

      Delete
    6. Lou Reeds Disco Mystic shouldn't work but somehow fits on The Bells album. But Laughing Lou was a bit of a joker.

      Delete
  16. As a San Francisco Trivia note, google Bowie Mars Hotel, and you'll find Ziggy got to the Mars Hotel before the Dead. Well...USED it, before the Dead. I'm sure they knew about it before he did. I remember walking by the joint for years, it was in a bad part of town, but it was my sales territory.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Uh ... what were you selling? Grit newspapers?

      Delete
    2. At the time, dictation equipment, copiers, and AT clone computers. My zip code was 94105, south of Market Street ("South of the slot" if I was tailing Floyd Thursby...). In keeping with this topic, I sold a portable microcassette to Dead lyricist John Perry Barlow.

      With my impeccable sense of market timing, I switched to print media in the '92 recession and worked for the Oakland Tribune until I got the downsizing boot in 2017.

      Delete
    3. "I sold a portable microcassette to Dead lyricist John Perry Barlow." For some reason, this seems to distill the essence of th' IoF©.

      Delete
  17. I'm not a convert but like a lot of artists I used to dislike (strongly in this case) I have been able to start appreciating some of the Dead's music. It took a long time since during my college experience in the 80s it was common to walk down the street on a weekend night and hear at least three different bands playing "Good Loving" and see scads of preppies wearing tie-died shirts. Not the band's fault of course; rather a curse of their success in building their own unprecedented universe. Nonetheless, I held a strong bias against them for decades and most of what I heard in the intervening years did little to change my mind.

    I still find most of their repertoire of old-timey folk-blues rather tedious; just not my cup of tea. But since I got Sirius XM a few years ago there has been the occasion where I'll flip to the Grateful Dead station, often with senses heightened, and hear the rich and intricate tapestries that they can weave when they stretch out and leave the song behind. Unfortunately there's a lot of muck to tread through to get to those clear pure springs of telepathic interplay. Still, when you get there it is a thing of beauty.

    I recently watched the "Long Strange Trip" series on NetFlix and would really recommend that to anyone who shares an interest in improvisation and music inspired/informed by the psychedelic experience but has a similar aversion to the band and/or scene. The selected music is excellent and in the context of the documentary holds one interest and never gets to the point of tedium. Definitely gave me a better appreciation of the band and what they accomplished. Highly recommended, especially with a little neural stimulation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Long Strange Trip" is not only essential but a lot of fun. And it gives a terrifying insight into the pressures of being Jerry Garcia.

      Delete
  18. Agitation Free is the one Dead-influenced band I can play to my Deadhead friends and hear them admit that there was a band that existed at the same time capable of (both instrumentally and psychedelically) playing circles around Jerry and company. Anyone who hasn't heard Malesch, 2nd or Live at the Cliffs of the River Rhein is missing out on some amazing space jams.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Let's play Jeopardy. What band is the cross between Manassas and Soft Machine?

    !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know this*, so I'm going to leave it to the other 4/5g©!





      *(a lie)

      Delete