Thursday, May 30, 2019

Frat Boys On Acid

When teen prom bands heard Sgt. Pepper they realized their snappy suits, ruffled shirt collars, and keg-party dance moves were starting to look straight outta Squaresville. More worryingly, they noticed the chicks in the audience drifting away to the long-hair dudes slouching in the shadows. Ever mindful of the need to improve artistically and continue to get laid, they retreated to the studio to craft their own Sgt. Peppers.

Paul Revere & The Raiders were among the first to be second in line with their superfine Something Happening album, which naturally stiffed, alienating their milkshake teenybopper fanbase without convincing acid-dropping heads they were riding the FURTHUR bus. It also had a grotesquely cheap cover (not the gorgeous Peter Max design you get here ABSOLUTELY FREE) just to kill any possibility of an impulse buy. Do an image search if you want to see just how important sleeve design is, and how dumb record companies could be.

John Fred & His Playboy Band were, if possible, squarer than a square dance in the town square of Squaresville, Square County. Obviously uncomfortable with the Age of Aquarius, they took a deep breath, draped themselves with love beads, and came up with their generation-defining and status-quo-threatening Permanently Stated album. And they had the nous [French for us - Ed.] to dress it up in a fab sleeve, too. That's one of the first uses of that computery/psychedelic font on a pop album, like you care.

It says something bad about me that I enjoy both these albums as much as their "real thing" inspiration. They're guileless, mindless fun, and their transparent opportunism is part of their charm. And musically, they're professionally put together (both these bands knew how to deliver a great show) and a treat for the ears.

Downloads are weighted with the usual CD-era penalty tracks, compromising their artistic integrity but pleasing the lazy freeloader in all of us.

8 comments:

  1. I also love it when squares go psychedelic and, as you point out, in these cases professional competence guarantees reasonable quality in the results.

    ReplyDelete
  2. There's some more in this line coming up. I'm sure you have these already, Mr Fan, but I'll upload them as soon as I get out of my parole hearing.

    And while we're here - as much as I love Sgt Pepper (at least the Compleat Version), that too was as shaped by contemporary culture as these albums. The Beatles didn't invent psychedelia, they just picked up on it earlier than most, and gave it the highest profile.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi there! I love your blog and your writing is hilarious, but (correct me if I'm wrong) there's not much evidence that the punters are thronging to read it. Shame!

    I've given you a plug on the blog I visit most - Twilightzone - which I am confident will do the trick and swiftly propel you to a life of popularity and wealth.

    Man, you need to make this comment box bigger. I've had my head stuck for 40 minutes!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks 'Easily Confused' I've just come from Twilightzone. I'm enjoying this blog and look forward to many visits. Just to say that I appreciate the hard work that goes into running a blog. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I came here from the just mentioned plug...I haven't delved very deeply into your blog yet, but since I've long been a fan of "Permanently Stated", I had to throw in the context for my coming to the album way back in the late 60's. I wasn't particularly fond of JF&HPB's breakthough single - "Judy In Disguise" when I heard it on its run as a hit on AM radio, but a bit afterwards, I read a piece by the soon-to-be-self-named "Dean Of Rock Writers" Robert Christgau discussing a few "unhip" records that actually were a real groove. He raved about Tom Jones' voice, and he raved about the bass-line in "Judy". I wasn't a huge collector of singles, but did buy the 2 or 3 leading up to "Permanently State" - both sides of each ended up on the record. I've never found anyone who even liked it when I played it for them...thanks for sharing it today! I will explore you're blog further...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for the comments! A couple of things that don't concern me (life is too short) - I'm not worried about how many people know about the blog. I do it for my own amusement. There's a few more than four or five, and that's enough, because they're very smart people. Bitrate of downloads is another - I can't hear the difference between 192 and 320, and getting the maximum amount of tracks onto my iPod is more important than straining for some kind of bat-eared "fidelity". I don't even care much if it's mono or stereo - the magic's in the music, and that changed my life back in the sixties heard on a crappy little transistor radio through a deaf-aid earpiece.
    I give pieces titles which makes searching for content difficult. This is policy. I want the blog to be like a thrift store run by a curmudgeon, where you dig through the crates to find the treasure while the owner talks to himself. So have a delve!
    As to size of the comments box - I've had a few complaints from people getting stuck. All I can suggest is greasing your body in goose fat before entering, or getting a small child to comment for you, in the manner of a Dickensian chimneysweep.

    (Judy In Disguise is awesome. I stuck it on Permanently Stated because I love it with an undying passion that cannot be expressed in mere words. I'd like it played at my funeral, so my remaining friends can cast aside their zimmer frames and dance).

    ReplyDelete
  7. What a beautiful curation! I haven't even looked at the comp yet, I just enjoy your promotional puffery.

    ReplyDelete